Coordinating Board for Higher Education Meeting Minutes 02-02

February 7, 2002

The Coordinating Board for Higher Education met at 10:15 a.m. on Thursday, February 7, 2002 at Ramada Inn, Jefferson City. Members present were:

Marie Carmichael, Chair
Sandra Kauffman, Vice Chair
Jim Summers Jr., Secretary
John Bass
Diana Bourisaw
Dudley Grove
Adam Fischer
Mary Joan Wood

Mary Findley was absent from the meeting.

Also attending were:

Kala M. Stroup, Commissioner of Higher Education
Debra Cheshier, Director of Strategic Planning and Policy Development for MOSTARS
Linda Danek, Administrative Assistant
Nancy Devino, Director, Missouri Learners' Network
Scott Giles, Director of Lender, Institutions and Student Services for MOSTARS
Joe Martin, Associate Commissioner for Fiscal & Legislative Affairs
James Matchefts, General Counsel and Director of Legal Affairs for MOSTARS
Dan Peterson, Director of Student Financial Assistance for MOSTARS
Richard Presberry, Director of Early Awareness/Outreach for MOSTARS
Cheryl Schroeder, Public Information Specialist
Robert Stein, Associate Commissioner for Academic Affairs and Planning
Leroy Wade, Director for Proprietary School Certification
John Wittstruck, Deputy Commissioner

There being a quorum present, Chair Carmichael called the meeting to order. A list of guests attending the meeting is attached.

Minutes of December 6, 2002 CBHE Meeting

Senator Bass moved that the minutes be approved as submitted. Dr. Bourisaw seconded the motion, and it was unanimously passed.

Report of the Commissioner

Commissioner Stroup acknowledged staff in attendance. She drew attention to the submitted research proposals on life sciences being reviewed for funding by the $21.5 million tobacco settlement. There are 17 proposals. Each proposal is extraordinary in two ways, (1) leading edge research being proposed and (2) superb collaboration among higher education institutions and external institutions

Report of the CBHE Presidential Advisory Committee

Dr. Manuel Pacheco reported that the CBHE Presidential Advisory Committee met earlier in the day and discussed the following items:

• Comparison of FY 2003 CBHE Appropriations Request with the Governor's Recommendations
• Lincoln University/State Fair Community College Resolution
• Update on the Missouri K-16 Coalition
• Summary of Proposed Legislation Related to Higher Education

Comparison of FY 2003 CBHE Appropriations Request with the Governor's Recommendation

Mr. Martin described the comparisons of the FY 2003 budget recommendation made by the Governor and the CBHE Appropriations Request. The Governor is recommending a 10 percent core reduction for all institutions. The UM-related core budgets were also reduced by 10 percent. State Seminary Funds and MOREnet maintained their core budget at the FY 2002 level. The MOBIUS increase will cover one-half of the ongoing costs with the institutions responsible for the remaining amount. In the financial assistance (MOSTARS) programs, the administrative core was reduced 13 percent in funding and 17 percent in FTE, the Advantage Missouri program was reduced to fund only continuing students and no additional funds were recommended for any of the other student grant programs.

The Governor's recommendation reduced the Coordinating Administration core funding by 18 percent and the FTE 24 percent, and eliminated the contracting for academic programs line of $250,000 (Kansas-Missouri Reciprocal Agreement).

The recommendation level significantly reduces higher education's percentage of general revenue and places institutions at approximately the FY 1997 level in terms of purchasing power.

Mrs. Kauffman moved that the Coordinating Board for Higher Education acknowledge the Governor's FY 2003 budget recommendations for the Department of Higher Education. The CBHE realizes the severe impact of the FY 2003 core reductions and expresses its understanding and support of the difficult decisions required of all institutions as a result of these fiscal constraints. It is recommended that in the event additional revenues are identified during the appropriation process, they be applied to the original CBHE recommendations. Mary Joan Wood seconded the motion, and it was unanimously passed.

Lincoln University/State Fair Community College Resolution

Dr. Stein stated that the board, through its statutory authority, has promoted public policy that supports an expanded technical education delivery system throughout the state. While community colleges are assigned a lead role in helping the state to advance technical education, all institutions have a potential role to play. As envisioned, institutions are expected to work cooperatively through regional technical education councils (RTEC) in identifying needs of particular regions and in designing a delivery system that will utilize existing resources and strengths within Missouri's system of higher education. Processes and policies have been put in place to ensure regional planning and regional decision making rather than to superimpose a single delivery model to be implemented in every community throughout the state. It is important to note that over the years decentralized decision making has served Missouri well. We have increased the number and quality of associate degrees and student participation in these programs. Missouri workforce benefits from these successes. Last fall in response to a request by Lincoln University, a chief academic officers' conflict resolution committee was appointed to mediate communications between Lincoln University and State Fair Community College. Since December 2001, the board has reviewed extensively all pertinent material, correspondences, statutes, policies related to State Fair Community College course offerings in Jefferson City.

The presidents and members of their respective governing board from State Fair Community College and Lincoln University were invited to address the board regarding the proposed recommendation.

In developing a recommended action for board approval several issues were taken into consideration. These included:

• The board's commitment to expand access to postsecondary technical education in Jefferson City.
• Board authorization given to SFCC to offer a limited number of one-year certificates and AAS degrees in Jefferson City.
• The fact that Jefferson City is not part of a community college taxing district.
• The belief that SFCC should not overstep its limited authority to be in Jefferson City.
• The desire for institutions to work more collaboratively.
• The board's commitment to set policy and to avoid micro-management of institutional actions.

President Henson, Lincoln University, stated that the recommendation provides the basis for resolving many of the concerns that Lincoln has about the parameters of its relationship with State Fair Community College. As long as these recommendations are adhered to, he can recommend to Lincoln's board that they support the recommendation and that it provides the framework for the University to enter into further agreements with State Fair Community College.

President Poort, State Fair Community College, noted that he is confident about the recommendation and that State Fair Community College and Lincoln University should not have problems in the future. He indicated his only concern is in the area of technical education where courses are required to meet industry standards and hopes that the intent of this recommendation is not to require course by course approval of technical courses. Dr. Poort suggested that course-by course approval should only apply to general education courses.

Mr. Ken Brown, State Fair Community College board member stated that he also thought it is a good sound solution and will work.

Mrs. Carmichael noted that the intent of the recommendation is for CBHE staff to make course by course approvals. The board would like State Fair Community College to examine the contents of its courses and make sure there is equivalence among items rather than to rely solely on a course syllabus.

President Poort stated that the implementation of the recommendation will clarify his concerns.

Mrs. Carmichael stated that the board has poured over countless letters and other information and has developed a framework for when a community college goes outside its taxing district to offer courses but not to establish a full-service community college. Dr. Poort agreed with Mrs. Carmichael's statement.

Mrs. Carmichael noted that the board should receive regular updates from staff on the implementation of the recommendation and consider any changes to them as may be required in the future.

Mr. Summers moved that the current recommendation as revised, be passed.

It is recommended that State Fair Community College, in designing a delivery system for its authorized technical programs in Jefferson City, should, when feasible, build on currently available general education and occupation-related coursework and utilize the human resources and facilities of local providers, including the local Area Vocational Technical School.

It is further recommended that the CBHE require State Fair Community College to submit, on a semester-by-semester basis for CBHE review and approval, all courses intended for delivery in Jefferson City. In preparing its request, State Fair Community College should work with its RTEC partners and should analyze course-enrollment and graduation data from previous terms to estimate the minimum number of courses and sections needed for students in the authorized technical education programs. Requests should also include a description of any contractual arrangements made with local providers. Student demand to enroll in general education courses for other than technical program completion will not be considered in assessing demand.

It is also recommended that State Fair Community College review its advertising to ensure that it does not present itself as a full-service community college and that State Fair Community College take a minimalist approach in the number of courses it requests for approval for delivery in Jefferson City.

It is further recommended that as a local provider with a full complement of general education courses, Lincoln University should be given the opportunity for a first right of refusal to teach all general education courses offered as State Fair Community College courses. Furthermore, during these times of extensive financial stress to all of higher education, the Coordinating Board directs the Commissioner of Higher Education to reinforce, with Missouri's college presidents and chancellors, the importance of promoting collaboration, avoiding unnecessary duplication, and resolving conflicts quickly.

It is expected that as a result of this board action, there will be a significant reduction in the number of courses (both type and sections) offered as State Fair Community College courses in Jefferson City.

Mrs. Kauffman seconded the motion, and it was unanimously passed.

Update on the Lake of the Ozarks Community College Steering committee

Dr. Wittstruck stated that during the April 2001 board meeting, the board was notified that a Lake of the Ozarks Community College steering committee had been formed to consider the feasibility of establishing a new community college taxing district in the Lake of the Ozarks area of the state. He introduced Ms. Nickie Foster, chair, and Mr. Frank Christiansen, steering committee member, who requested the opportunity to address the board on the status of the feasibility study required as part of the board's policies and procedures related to establishing a new community college district. Dr. Don Shook, consultant to the Steering committee was also introduced.

Ms. Foster thanked the members for the opportunity to speak with the board and introduced three superintendents who also were in attendance and have an interest in the proposal; Mr. Ron Hendricks, Camdenton Public Schools, Mr. Stan Johnson, School of the Osage, and Mr. Clinton Waters of Macks Creek, R-V.

A brief overview of the history of events that led to the establishment of the steering committee was given by Ms. Foster. She also noted that the committee asked school boards of five interested school districts to consider, during their respective October 2001 board meetings, the question of joining the effort to undertake the feasibility study. Of the five, the school boards of two districts, Camdenton R-III and Osage Beach, agreed to participate. The school boards for the other three school districts indicated their preference to wait and possibly annex to the new community college taxing district if it is established.

While the two school districts have the assessed valuation to meet the board's standards for establishing new community college taxing districts, Ms. Foster noted that the two districts do not have the population or school enrollment necessary to meet the board's projected enrollment requirements.

Mr. Christiansen stated that the Lake of the Ozarks is prosperous, growing, and alive and well as he reviewed the material prepared for and distributed to the board. He indicated that the area has an assessed valuation of almost one billion dollars with a large number of expensive homes. The steering committee members believe that a large number of second homeowners will take advantage of a local community college. The Coordinating Board's standards do not, however, permit the steering committee to include this kind of anticipated participation in the feasibility study. He noted that with the majority of the assessed valuation being located in the two school districts, there is a better chance of the voters passing a referendum to establish a new community college taxing district than if the three smaller districts were to be included. Mr. Christiansen concluded by saying that the steering committee believes the board's enrollment standards will be met, given the fact that enrollments in the local schools are increasing, many students and residents from bordering school districts would enroll and a significant number of people who have second homes in the area will take advantage of a community college.

Dr. Shook reported that since he became a consultant to the Steering committee, he and the committee have worked to organize and structure their proposal to be consistent with the Coordinating Board's policies, procedures, and standards for establishing new community college districts. It is important to note that the two participating school district boards support the proposal and with the Coordinating Board's approval, would submit the proposal to their registered voters for a referendum on the question in April 2003.

It was further reported by Dr. Shook that Camdenton R-III and School of the Osage school districts have an assessed valuation of over $900 million, which is more than the assessed valuation of six of Missouri's existing community college districts. The taxing district would cover three counties, Camden, Morgan, and Miller with a combined population of over 80,000. The two districts have two-thirds of the total assessed valuation in the three county area since the tax base is concentrated in these districts. It is clear that the community college would have to draw students and other enrollments from outside the proposed taxing district. In addition to the other information provided, Dr. Shook noted that only one-third of the cost for the community college would have to be borne by the state as the majority of the college's funding would come from local support, tuition and fees.

Ms. Foster indicated that the number of students going on to postsecondary education from the Lake of the Ozarks region of the state is low compared to those communities and areas that have access to local community colleges. While participating school districts must have an average daily attendance of 1,600 in grades 10, 11, and 12, by current board standard the two participating schools and other schools in the area graduate about 1,200 students per year. Dr. Shook noted community colleges and the services they offer have changed significantly over the last 10-15 years. Perhaps the standards are no longer appropriate and should be revised. The existing enrollment projection methodology contained in the board's rule, which is based on the population only within the proposed taxing district and average daily attendance in the participating schools in grades 10, 11, and 12 may no longer be appropriate. Currently, some 40 percent of the state's community college enrollments are now over the age of 25.

Ms. Foster requested that the Coordinating Board consider giving the steering committee a variance on the enrollment requirements included in the standards and rule for establishing new community college taxing districts.

Several board members indicated they needed more time to study the issue. Mrs. Grove asked if data were available on non-traditional age groups residing in the area and if other institutions were offering courses in the area.

Ms. Foster mentioned that State Fair Community College is offering courses at the area vocational technical school in Camdenton and operated a CBHE approved 1456 site in the community. Columbia College is offering baccalaureate programs in the Lake area.

Mrs. Kauffman inquired about A+ designated high schools in the area. Ms. Foster replied that both the Camdenton and Eldon schools are designated as A+ schools by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.

Mr. Fisher noted that the presentation by steering committee members was impressive, but expressed concern about new community colleges emerging everywhere across the state. He needs more time to study the issue.

Both Mrs. Carmichael and Mr. Fisher encouraged the committee to continue pursuing its proposal, but noted that the board is not ready to make a decision about the request for a variance on enrollment standards. Mrs. Carmichael asked the staff to prepare background materials the board needs to examine and study so this issue can be considered again by the board at its April 2002 meeting.

MOSTARS Report

Dr. Wittstruck mentioned the successful MOSTARS Advisory Committee meeting that occurred the day before. The Coordinating Board established the advisory committee during its February 10, 2000 meeting. He thanked Senator Bass for his continuing commitment to the Advisory board's work as the Coordinating Board's appointment to the board.

Senator Bass mentioned that he was pleased that the CBHE and MOSTARS are involved with early awareness and outreach through the GEAR UP grant from the U.S. Department of Education. This program allows the board to be more aggressive in helping students and families over come many of the barriers they face, from language to having low-incomes, in accessing the state's system of higher education. He mentioned that continuing barriers and issues low-income and minority families face must be addressed even in times of severe budget constraints.

Mrs. Carmichael asked why GEAR UP is focused on mathematics. Dr. Wittstruck responded that it is an area of study targeted in the grant proposal based on some of the recommendations of the first K-16 report. He mentioned that other areas of improved performance are also being targeted.

Mrs. Grove asked if any GEAR UP money has been received. Dr. Wittstruck mentioned that the grant funds had been received but could not be fully used until after the FY 2002 supplemental request for GEAR UP was approved by the General Assembly. Without the supplemental, some of the programmatic initiatives were being curtailed but did note that Dr. Presberry, Director of Early Awareness/Outreach, reported to the MOSTARS Advisory Committee that 3,074 middle school students are participating in the grant-related activities. These students are participating in a number of after school activities to raise their achievement level in mathematics and other courses and as they begin to prepare for college. She asked that a report on GEAR UP activities be prepared for a future CBHE meeting.

Finally, Dr. Wittstruck reported that CBHE staff participated in an exit interview with the state auditors on their audit of the MOSTARS federal funds and that no significant findings were mentioned. Also, the staff prepared an appeal letter for U.S. Secretary of Education Paige related to the return of $32 million from the federal reserve fund. He noted that the letter was distributed to the board members.

Institutional Eligibility to Participate in the Student Financial Assistance Programs - Texas County Technical Institute

Dr. Wittstruck mentioned that periodically schools come forward and apply for participation in the state scholarship and grant programs. This request from Texas County Technical Institution is such a request. The staff recommendation is based on the review of the required materials submitted with the application.

Mr. Summers moved that Texas County Technical Institute be approved as an eligible institution to participate in the state student financial assistance programs administered by the CBHE beginning with the 2002-2003 academic year. Mrs. Kauffman seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously.

Participation of Proprietary Schools in MOREnet

Dr. Stein acknowledged Dr. Nancy Devino, research associate in academic affairs and director of the Missouri Learners' Network who worked along with others on this proposal. He noted that MOREnet was established in 1991 to be a statewide electronic network, providing Internet access to Missouri's public and independent colleges and universities, elementary and secondary schools, public libraries, teaching hospitals and clinics and state government.

In recent years there has been increased interest by the state's private career (proprietary) schools in joining MOREnet. He noted that one proprietary school has been a member of MOREnet since its inception.

Mrs. Carmichael expressed concern that, as for-profit institutions, proprietary schools should pay a surcharge above and beyond the normal membership fees since MOREnet was built with state funds and funds from nonprofit public and independent colleges and universities. Dr. Stein noted that the recommendation before the board does not preclude charges for up front investment costs. He noted that the recommendation before the board consists of guidelines for MOREnet membership, but Dr. Stein indicated that the words "at least ensure the recovery of full costs" could be added to amend the recommendation. These guidelines will set the framework for MOREnet and University of Missouri to determine an appropriate charge. Mrs. Carmichael indicated that would be helpful.

Mrs. Grove then moved the amended recommendation that the Coordinating Board for Higher Education approve that proprietary schools meeting the following conditions be eligible for consideration to access MOREnet services.

• The proprietary institution expresses and interest in receiving MOREnet services.
• The proprietary institution is accredited by a recognized regional or national accrediting organization.
• The proprietary institution grants degrees at the associate level or above.
• The proprietary institution has been operating in Missouri at least fifty years or whose main campus is located in Missouri.
• The proprietary institution has been certified by the Coordinating Board's Proprietary School Certification Program.

Furthermore, it is recommended that the fee structures established for proprietary schools given access to MOREnet services at least ensure the recovery of the full cost for these services.

Mrs. Wood seconded the motion and it was unanimously passed.

Advanced Placement Report

Dr. Stein introduced this discussion item by referencing the board's long standing commitment to the College Board's Advanced Placement Program. This program provides advanced high school students with an opportunity to take freshman university-level courses taught in the high school by specially trained teachers. The CBHE has expressed a strong commitment to the College Board's AP program, in part because the presence of AP courses in a high school has the effect of raising standards and expectations for all students. The goal that every Missouri high school will provide opportunities for AP was adopted by the board in 1992 and reaffirmed, as part of the Blueprint for Higher Education, in 1996. Dr. Sterling Cossaboom, Director of Advanced Placement at Southeast Missouri State University, and Ms. Wanda Hartsock, Director of Advanced Placement at Truman State University, described their efforts as directors of their respective institutions' Advanced Placement Institutes and the Advanced Placement Advisory Council, in promoting the use of Advanced Placement Courses in Missouri high schools. Their report, Advanced Placement, Two-year Report, 1999 - 2001 is to update board members on Missouri's accomplishments in AP since the last report to the board in February 1999.

The CBHE began supporting AP with its budget recommendations in FY97. Since fall 1996, Missouri has funded two AP Teacher Development (APTD) sites, one at Truman State University and the other at Southeast Missouri State University, to promote participation in AP and to support AP teacher-training institutes.

The CBHE's support for AP also included formation of the Missouri Advanced Placement Advisory Council in 1997. In March 1998, Ms. Marie Carmichael assumed chairmanship of the council.

The APTD site directors presented information about the state's AP initiatives at 16 conferences and 19 school district in-service workshops. AP training has been provided to 1,196 teachers from 150 public school districts and 31 private or parochial schools.

In recognition of the importance of AP in the state's education landscape, the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) has also committed significant resources to enhancing students' access to AP exams.

Dr. Hartsock stated that it has been very difficult to establish AP Programs in smaller schools, particularly when there is only one English or social studies teacher. She mentioned that many rural schools are choosing to provide access to dual-credit courses offered by colleges and universities rather than the College Board's AP courses.

In response to a question about goals for the program, Dr. Cossaboom said the program did not have specific numerical goals. Dr. Stein noted the board's goal is for every Missouri high school student to have access to AP courses.

While it is clear that Missouri has not achieved its goal that 100 percent of high schools will offer AP courses, it is difficult to draw conclusions about individual student and school participation. The CBHE is in the process of obtaining data from the College Board about the number of AP courses taught by high schools and the number of students enrolled in them. These data will position the AP Advisory Council to initiate follow-up studies and design strategies that increase both student and school AP participation.

Update on the Missouri K-16 Coalition

Dr. Stein indicated that the attached draft of, Achievement Gap Elimination: Report of the K-16 Task Force, was discussed earlier in the day by the CBHE Presidential Advisory Committee. He mentioned that the K-16 Taskforce on Achievement Gap Elimination (K-16 TAGE) would be meeting in Jefferson City on February 28, 2002 to finalize and adopt its report.

Dr. Bourisaw indicated that recent research shows that preparation of prospective teachers focuses on preparing teachers to teach white, middle-class students and that most teachers are non-minority. In addition, research shows that increasing numbers of minority students in special education are being taught by non-minority teachers and that special education for these students is not, therefore, working.

Senator Bass expressed his concern that there is a lack of cultural literacy by many teachers, i.e., many teachers are not prepared to teach minority students and students from low-income families and neighborhoods. These students often attend schools where the teachers do not understand or appreciate the culture and lifestyles of their students. He mentioned that teachers cannot teach students when they are unfamiliar with the cultural environment of their students. He encouraged the use of the "buddy system," where there are resources for individual students and teachers available on a daily basis.

Mrs. Carmichael mentioned that the biggest factor associated with the low performance of schools is the quality of the classroom teacher. Focus should be directed on improving the quality of the teacher. There is a critical need for professional development opportunities for teachers and other school personnel. She mentioned studies show that, with high quality teachers, low performing students perform at a higher level. In addition, she said that in many instances, research shows low performing schools have a large number of teachers teaching out of their field, or the academic disciplines in which they received their academic preparation. Mrs. Carmichael further indicated that it was the quality of teachers that higher education can impact and that college professors, from all academic disciplines, have to get involved in issues of teacher preparation. She recommended that a task force be created composed of arts and sciences faculty and college or department of education faculty to look at teacher preparation programs curriculum content to determine if there is alignment between curriculum and statewide standards future teachers are expected to meet.

Summary of Proposed Legislation Related to Higher Education.

Mr. Martin reviewed the summary of higher education legislation being considered by the Second Regular Session of the 91st General Assembly attached to the board's agenda. He mentioned proposed legislation exists to establish a Challenge Scholarship Program for students in their first two years of college who do not receive a state A+ scholarship at one of the state's public community colleges, area vocational schools, Linn State Technical College or other designated eligible postsecondary institution. This legislation has a large fiscal note since students in any other type of Missouri public or independent two- or four-year college or university would be eligible for the Challenge Scholarship.

Legislation has also been introduced to change the names of some Missouri public four-year colleges and universities. In addition, legislation has been introduced that requires any school receiving public money to have students recite the Pledge of Allegiance each morning during the first class of the day. Another piece of legislation urges the Coordinating Board to require institutions to establish and enact policies related to credit card companies soliciting students' participation and use of their respective credit card.

Mr. Fisher asked if legislation to change institutional names is the result of these institutions following the Coordinating Board's policy guidelines and procedures for institutional name changes and nomenclature.

Mrs. Carmichael noted that the Board had a policy on institutional nomenclature and proposals to change the names of institutions should meet the board's guidelines for changes. The sponsors of such bills should be sent copies of the board's nomenclature policy. She expressed concern that designation as a "university" suggests the institution offers post-baccalaureate programs, which is often not the case. She asked staff to draft a letter and send a copy of the board's institutional nomenclature guidelines to the sponsors of these bills. In addition, name change by one institution in a state supported system affects every institution in the system and the system itself and is a matter for the CBHE.

Mr. Fisher moved that the Coordinating Board go on record as opposing House Bill 1799 and any other legislation that might lead to a change in the name of a Missouri public college or university, regardless of whether it is first introduced in the House or the Senate. Mrs. Grove seconded the motion and the motion was passed unanimously.

Information Items

The board received the following information items:

• MOSTARS Reports
  • Recertification of Eligibility for Institutional Participation in the Charles Gallagher Student Financial Assistance Program
  • GEAR UP Missouri
  • Student Financial Aid Awareness Activities
• Distribution of Community College Funds
• Academic Program Actions
• Proprietary School Certification Actions and Reviews
• Distribution of Eisenhower Professional Development Program Funds
• Update on Midwest Student Exchange Program
• Annual Report on Campus-based Reviews of Existing Programs-Public Four-year Institutions

In concluding the board meeting, Mr. Fisher moved that the Coordinating Board proceed into executive session to discuss issues as they may pertain to Section RSMo 610.021(1) "relating to "legal actions, causes of action or litigation involving a public governmental body and any confidential or privileged communications between a public governmental body or its representatives and its attorneys" and Section RSMo 610.021(3) "relating to "hiring, firing, disciplining or promoting of particular employees by a public governmental body when personal information about the employee is discussed or recorded."

Mrs. Carmichael asked for a roll call vote on the motion.

Mr. Bass - yes
Dr. Bourisaw - yes
Mrs. Carmichael - yes
Mr. Fisher - yes
Mrs. Grove - yes
Mr. Summers - yes
Mrs. Wood - yes
Mrs. Kauffman - yes

The motion passed unanimously.

Adjournment

There being no further business to come before the board, Mr. Fischer moved that the meeting adjourn.Mrs. Kauffman seconded the motion and it was unanimously passed.

____________________________________
Marie Carmichael, Chair

______________________________
Jim Summers, Jr., Secretary